A day in the life of...

I’ve recently been using ASP MVC 2 to develop a business application.  As you may already know the ASP MVC routing system works with URLs which look like this http://localhost/Client/Details/IBM In standard ASPX apps the URL would look more like this http://localhost/Client/Details.aspx?code=IBM The first URL obviously looks much nicer than the 2nd, however it comes at a cost.  What if the “code” of your object is something like “N/A” for “Not applicable”?  You end up with a URL that looks like this http://localhost/AbsenceCode/Details/N/A What we really need is to have ASP MVC encode the value “N/A” as “N%2FA”.  The problem is that even if it did do this then by the time ASP MVC receives the value it has already been decoded, so we get a “400 bad request” error.  This is a real pain, because in business we can’t really tell a customer “You can only use characters A to Z, 0 to 9, underscore and minus in your codes” because they will tell you that they have used the code N/A

My current app is a website, each client gets their own unique database in order to help prevent possible data access from other clients (and meet various legal requirements too.)  One of the features of this application is that there is some core data (such as countries/currencies) which is maintained on behalf of the client.  This data will be identical for all clients, and only maintained by a system administrator. Obviously expecting the admin to log into each client to perform updates is unreasonable, so I have structured my app so that there is a separate Admin website which updates a master database and propagates the changes to all of the clients. When the master website does an update it performs it within an IUnitOfWork, and then tells the same update command to execute for each client database too.  If any of these updates fail for whatever reason then the whole thing needs to be cancelled whether one of the child databases updated or not. using (var distributedTransac

Update : Instead of decorating responses with IResponseFor<T> I now instead decorate the command/query with IExpectResponse<T> - Each command/query should only have one response type, and this way it makes it possible to specify the return type should be something simple like a GUID. My server application works purely on a request/response pattern, like so var query = new GetCustomerQuery(customerUniqueID); var response = AppServer.Execute < GetCustomerQuery , GetCustomerQueryResponse > (query); What I wanted to avoid though was the possibility that the user (me writing the client app) would do something silly like the following code and use the wrong pair combination var query = new GetCustomerQuery(customerUniqueID); var response = AppServer.Execute < GetCustomerQuery , GetEmployeeQueryResponse > (query); Up until now I had the server interface defined like this, so that I can at least ensure the generic parameters are a Query and R

The Enterprise Core Objects Persistence Mapper is a singleton which is used by all EcoSpace instances.  It’s purpose is to load mapping information from the DB when your app starts and to cache it, improving performance. I needed a connection per client, all running within a single application.  This was a problem because once the PMP is created its connection string is tied to a single database.  So I had to come up with a new PersistenceMapperDynamicSharer component.  It is used on the EcoSpace to specify the PMapper type; additionally you can specify a connection string to use. It works by dynamically creating a descendant class of your PersistenceMapperProvider at runtime, one for each connection string. public class PersistenceMapperDynamicSharer : PersistenceMapperSharer { static ReaderWriterLockSlim Locker = new ReaderWriterLockSlim(); static Dictionary < string , PersistenceMapperProvider > MapperProviders = new Dictionary < string , PersistenceMapperPr

My data-transfer-objects implement INotifyPropertyChanged, which was giving me a problem whenever I tried to serialise them over a Remoting session.  If you try to add [NonSerialized] to the event you get an error informing you that you can only apply this attribute to fields, and not properties. The solution is pretty simple, I think the .NET compiler should do this by default. [NonSerialized] PropertyChangedEventHandler propertyChanged; public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged { add { propertyChanged += value; } remove { propertyChanged -= value; } }

I wanted to use a common base class for a set of UserControls in my WPF application, but when I changed the class’s ancestor in the code file and compiled I would get the error “Partial declarations of must not specify different base classes” This is because when you compile a WPF application Visual Studio generates a partial class in a code-behind file automatically, the base type specified is always “UserControl”.  To solve this problem change your XAML from this   < UserControl x:Class ="MyApp.MyControl" /> To this < local:SomeBaseTypeYouWantToUse x:Class ="MyApp.MyControl" xmlns:local ="clr-namespace:NameSpace.To.Your.BaseClass" />

I found a few examples of web servers for MonoTouch but none of them parsed the data sent in a POST request.  I looked around the web and was unable to find any examples of how to achieve this.  So now that I’ve written it myself I’ve decided to share my own implementation.  This includes not only the code for processing the form post data but also for registering request handlers etc. Here is an example of how you would use the web server public BookUploadViewController() : base ( " BookUploadViewController " , null ) { RequestHandler = new DefaultRequestHandler(); var defaultActionHandlerFactory = new DefaultActionHandlerFactory(); RegisterActionHandlers(defaultActionHandlerFactory); RequestHandler.AddActionHandlerFactory(defaultActionHandlerFactory); WebServer = new EmbeddedWebServer(RequestHandler); } void RegisterActionHandlers(DefaultActionHandlerFactory factory) { fact

I've recently been doing some work on a Bold for Delphi application. I am really quite surprised how much I am still impressed with this framework, it really was (and still is) so much ahead of its time. Embarcadero really should revive this product and put it back into Delphi. They could make it a free addition to Delphi, or maybe even ship it with Delphi as an open source project. Embarcadero! You have a great tool here, don't hide it away, use it!

http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2009/06/free-one-year-technet-plus-subscription.ars Update: The UK link from this site has been taken down :-)

I searched for "mrpmorris" on bing.com recently.  Now on Google it would show the address of my blog as the first result, which is very relevant.  On Bing it showed a page from a web chat from over 3 years ago, not very impressive. Not sure how long this photo will remain on the web for, but I found it quite interesting... http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3604/3585051300_d23a37a32e_o.png

Martin wrote to me and explained something I wasn't aware of. He doesn't catalogue best practises or only the ones he likes, he is cataloguing all patterns he can find. He said he would rather someone made an informed bad decision than an uninformed good one. Not quite sure I agree with that either :-)

I have just read this blog by Martin Fowler. I like a lot of what Martin writes, but this is not one of them. The article suggests using inheritance to separate code-generated classes and manually written classes. You would descend from a code-generated class instead of trying to modify the code-generated source. The problems I see with this are Attributes If I have a descendant of a code-generated class how do I attach .NET attributes to members? I’d have to override them and add the attribute in the descendant which would mean all of my members need to be virtual. Obviously this wouldn’t work for Private members. I expect you’d have to attach all of your attributes in the tool which generates the source code, but I don’t like this idea. I will explain why later. Sealed / final What if we want to create a sealed/final class? We can’t. What if we want a specific member to be sealed/final? Then we couldn’t add attributes to the members. Partial Microsoft introduced Partial clas

Someone kindly gave me a £100 gift certificate for Amazon.  I posted a request for book suggestions to 3 groups where I would expect to receive good recommendations    http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/altdotnet/    http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/    http://groups.google.com/group/RhinoMocks I received a lot of recommendations (thanks everyone!) - here are the ones I have bought:   Building Domain Specific Languages in Boo   Writing Secure Code, Second Edition   Analysis Patterns Reusable Object Models (OBT)   How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method   Object Oriented Project Design   Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change   Getting Things Done: How to Achieve Stress-free Productivity    Here are the books that made it onto my "future" list which I didn't have enough cash for this time around.   http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/registry/wishlist/13GXONVVMLHZZ I generally went for the cheaper books first, so that I could get as much inp