A day in the life of...

It is amazing! I'll leave that previous post just in case anyone ever needs to create an ECO object instance first and then connect it with an EcoSpace afterwards, but you don't need it for MonoRail! public void Join([EcoDataBind("User")]User user) { PropertyBag["User"] = user; if (this.Params["User.FirstName"] != null) { GetErrors(user.AsIObject(), Errors); if (Context.Params["ConfirmEmailAddress"] != user.EmailAddress) Errors.Add("Email address confirmation does not match email address."); if (Errors.Count == 0) { //TODO EcoSpace.UpdateDatabase(); Redirect("Account", "Home"); }//No errors } } That's all there is to it now! I have created a small set of classes to enable ECO support in MonoRail. Instead of descending your controllers from SmartDispatcherController you will now descend from EcoSmartDispatcherController . This gives the following abi

So I didn't like Ruby on Rails much. More accurately I didn't like the Ruby language or ActiveRecord much, but the "Rails" part I really quite liked! So my investigation continues and I have found myself looking at MonoRails. MonoRails is what I would have as a child called "a rip off", but these days it is known as a "clone" :-) It's basically a .NET version of Rails, which obviously appeals to me because I liked the Model-View-Controller approach of Rails and I obviously like C#. MonoRails has its own version of ActiveRecord (which I shall be avoiding) and an interface into NHibernate too (which I haven't looked at in great depth, but it certainly doesn't look as powerful as ECO). So I have been trying to get MonoRails working with ECO instead. Considering I don't know MonoRails at all I am surprised at how quickly I managed to do what I wanted. Take the following controller method as an example, when the user visits localho

I've just been driven mad by a "Quantum bug". What is a quantum bug? Well, it's a bug that doesn't exist unless you look at it :-) I kept getting a NullReferenceException in my code. It happened whenever I changed a property of a class. I assumed it was something in the framework, but it was in fact in a library of my own. When the property changed it would trigger an observer I had attached, the purpose of this observer is to check if the form that owns my component is the active form, if it is then it records the object that changed; the purpose is to know which objects were modified by which form. Anyway, to check if the form is active I do this Form activeForm = System.Windows.Forms.Form.ActiveForm; Form activeMdiChildForm = activeForm.ActiveMdiChild; if (activeForm == this.Form || activeMdiChildForm == this.Form) ..... Now the quantum! If you are debugging your app Form.ActiveForm will always return null! How useful is that eh? :-) So, when debugging

I was REALLY looking forward to programming some apps on the Mac using Cocoa and objective-C. I am reading "Cocoa programming for MAC OS X" by Aaron Hillegas. I had read as far as page 30 when I saw the following: "Objective-C is a very simple language. It has no visibility specifiers: All methods are public; and all instance variables are protected. (Actually, there are instance specifiers for instance variables, but they are rarely used. The default is protected, and that works nicely.)" WHAT? Works nicely? I disagree! It is actually possible to make a class's method private by not including it in the interface declaration (myclass.h) and just adding the implementation file instead, but what about protected methods? public I expose as little as needed to ensure the class provides the service it was designed to. The signatures/names of members in my public area change as little as possible so as not to break other people's code. Public members are

That's it, I've had enough of Ruby on Rails! I like the rails part, it's a very clever approach, but I really dislike the Ruby part! The final straw occurred yesterday. It's very common in OOP to have the constructor set default values for your object just in case the consumer of your class does not set them. In C# I would do something like this..... public class Post : MyBaseClass { private bool isPost = true; } In Ruby I was trying to achieve this simple behaviour... 01: IsPost is set to true 02: A form is displayed with the default value 03: User changes the value 04: My Post instance is updated with the values from the form I tried to override Initialize() only. def Initialize super is_post = true end Now Post.new(params[:post]) is not reachable for some reason. So in my Post class I did this def Initialize(* params) super(params) is_post = true end The problem here is when I try to initialize the values from the form in my controller class. post = Pos

What a lot of grief! After trying more simple steps on another site (and failing) I eventually managed to get the following steps to work: http://hivelogic.com/narrative/articles/ruby-rails-mongrel-mysql-osx There were however some changes: 01: Make sure you download TextMate. I kept reading it as TextEdit for some reason, so just be aware of that when "mate ~/.bash_login" wont work. 02: One of the steps tells you to type "make ~/.bash_login". I found that adding the suggested text to that file made no difference when you log out/in or close the Terminal window. This was because a file named "~/.bash_profile" existed. If this file exists then you should modify it instead of the one mentioned in the article. 03: When trying to do "rake db:migrate" I would experience the following error: otherwise you will experience the following error: dyld: NSLinkModule() error dyld: Library not loaded: /usr/local/mysql/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.15.dylib Re